The other part that gets me is the "home resort" concept. I was sold on the whole "points" program and the option to go almost anywhere I want. But the up-front costs and annual maintenance fees are based on the home resort (a place which I may never return to). Seems to me that you'd want to have a cheap property (cheap as in "lower maintenance costs") as your home resort, but ample enough points to go where you want...when you want. In which case, you're not really buying a share of a single piece of real estate, but instead becoming a shareholder in a global vacation property program. I'd also suggest that the up-front costs be based on how many points you're buying (I suppose that the home resort could trigger a minimum point threshold to qualify).
On second thought, I'd guess that my ideas screw with the inherent benefits of property ownership (i.e., tax write-offs, name on a deed, etc.). I'll keep working the numbers to figure out to make this thing work. Am I missing anything?
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Location:Atlanta Airport
No comments:
Post a Comment